$10.00
Contributor: Christy Foley
Credits: 1.5 CME
Category: Ethics
This workshop will be a review of the published 2017 MEAC opinions in order to explain them and help mediators to understand the practical implications of them. Specifically, we will explore why the MEAC opinions were decided the way they were and how mediators can avoid the ethical issues addressed in each opinion.
Presenter Materials
MEAC Year in Review
| Judicial Circuit | COUNTIES IN THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT |
|---|---|
| 1 | Escambia, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa and Walton |
| 2 | Franklin, Gadsden, Jefferson, Leon, Liberty, and Wakulla |
| 3 | Columbia, Dixie, Hamilton, Lafayette, Madison, Suwannee and Taylor |
| 4 | Clay, Duval and Nassau |
| 5 | Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Marion and Sumter |
| 6 | Pasco and Pinellas |
| 7 | Flagler, Putnam, St. Johns and Volusia |
| 8 | Alachua, Baker, Bradford, Gilchrist, Levy, and Union |
| 9 | Orange and Osceola |
| 10 | Hardee, Highlands, and Polk |
| 11 | Dade |
| 12 | DeSoto, Manatee, and Sarasota |
| 13 | Hillsborough |
| 14 | Bay, Calhoun, Gulf, Holmes, Jackson and Washington |
| 15 | Palm Beach |
| 16 | Monroe |
| 17 | Broward |
| 18 | Brevard and Seminole |
| 19 | Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee and St. Lucie |
| 20 | Charlotte, Collier, Glades, Hendry and Lee |
